[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00370: Pocket guru and dogs in bed

From: Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:24:32 +0200
Subject: Pocket guru and dogs in bed

=========================================
I don't intend to discuss with spitting scum, but wish
to continue alerting innocent readers to blunders and
lies preached by our pocket guru Aki Orr.
=========================================
Aki brings to our attention some spectre of his
hallucinations named "De-Gaul", who apparently spoke
about "Participation" and "taking the dog into bed"
in some strange language ("Participation - ci, le
chien en-lit - non"), certainly not French, as there
are no such words as "ci" or "en-lit" in French.
=========================================
As to the French President De Gaulle, he did say:

"La réforme oui, la chienlit non".

Now, "chienlit" etymologically rooted in "chie en lit"
"(who) shits in bed" means today "masquerading scum".
No dogs called for, into bed or otherwise.

Thus De Gaulle said:

"Reform yes, masquerading scum no".

Unlike Aki's spectre "De-Gaul", the real De Gaulle never
spoke about "Participation" which makes Aki's deep
interrogation about why he did so, a bit difficult to
answer. But not surprising: old guru's trick of putting
something invented in somebody's mouth in order to
victoriously argue against it.

De Gaulle discerned below the crust of thugs, spitting
scum and Nanterre failures, a deep, genuine desire of
reforms and reacted to it sincerely and efficiently:

1.He reassured, encouraged and mobilized positive,
sincere people with his speech,

2.He dissolved the parliament and organized elections
in which the crashing majority voted for his movement
(358 MP's of 485). Aki's 9 million revolutionary workers
must have gone somewhere without leaving address, or,
more likely, they never existed, but got stirred up for
a moment by Hippies tidal wave and seduced by Cohn Bendit's
demagogy, recovered reason and turned against the
"rule by thugs".

3.He organized a Referendum, lost it and unlike today's
Chiracs, had the greatness and honesty to quit politics.
He came to power by referendum, left it by referendum
and was the first and most important protagonist of
rule by referenda in France. Had his successors not
betrayed him, France would long ago have I&R.

We are not here to talk about De Gaulle. Yet, our pocket
guru has chosen to defame him and consequently to falsify
the context where he appears, so that we seem to owe him
a rehabilitation.
=========================================
De Gaulle.
----------
I have, personally, mixt feelings with respect to
De Gaulle. I dislike his anti-Israeli and anti-Nato
policy and find his arrogant "Vive Quebec libre"
ridiculous. Yet, my feelings don't count and I'll try
to depict him as objectively as I can.

Poland
------
He was one of the commanders of the French expedition
force assisting Poland in the Bolshevik War. He
contributed actively and efficiently to defend:

1.Poland from the manyfold superior Red Army which
invaded the country in order to convert it to a Soviet
Republic in execution of Lenin's orders supported
by Polish traitors Dzierzynski, Rosa Luxemburg and
Marchlewski who has been nominated as head of the
"polish" puppet Soviet Government,

2.Whole Europe saved by the handful of Polish ulans
from being anexed by Soviet Union and enslaved by
Dzierzynski's Tche-Ka Gestapo in Gulag KZ's under
Rosa Luxemburg's version of "Arbeit Macht Frei".
Indeed, Germany, with Liebknecht and Luxemburg had a
ready Soviet structure waiting for the Red Army to
grasp the power. France lost all what was valid at
Verdun and consisted mainly of pimps and black
marketeers celebrating the Victory with Champagne
and Charleston.
Spain was mature for La Passionaria.

Nothing, apart the Polish handful assisted by some
French including De Gaulle, could stand in the way
of Trotski's and Budionny's cohorts.

Churchill's famous words about the "few" are perfectly
applicabme to this handful encompassing De Gaulle.

France Libre
------------
In the darkest moment of the WWII De Gaulle had
the vision and the guts to join the apparently lost
case and to convert what was still to save from
French ruins to "France Libre", one of the exiled allied
armies on the British soil and Resistance at home.

Algeria
-------
He finished the "dirty" Algerian war crushing the
opposition of his own generals with the risk of his life.

1968
----
He saved France from "rule by thugs", reinstalled the
order, promoted the rule by referenda and obeying the
verdict of a referendum, quitted politics.
Along with Golda Meir and several Israeli leaders he
proved to be an absolutely honest and incorruptible
politician living exclusively on his general's pension
and refusing any political gains such as the pension of
former President and gains from memories.

He kept the General grade of his life's summit when he
created "France Libre" and although commanding Marshals
refused promotion to this grade.

Georges

PS I attach for convenience my article "Scum and Gurus".
=========================================
 
===============================================
Scum and Gurus.
===============================================
By "Scum" we shall understand the extreme social 
failures, Gorki's "Lower Depths", Koestler's "Scum
of the Earth", the "déracinés". It is a vague 
class which encompasses many apparently dissimilar 
instances: Bowery, Portorican ghettos, Algerian 
ghettos in Paris suburbs, Palestinian Refugees 
in Arab KZ's, etc. These excluded, discriminated, 
oppressed people are the core of Scum, the evil 
product of our society for which we are all 
responsible. 

Around this core revolve individual "scums", people
whose self-conceited image is not recognized by the 
others and who blame this failure on the society, 
usually on some conspiration of Freemasons, Elders 
of Zion, Evolutionists or Vegetarians.  

Scum is periodically stirred up by brainstorming 
waves of dogmatic slogans dressed up as highbrow, 
sophisticated ideologies. They cannot originate 
from its illiterate core and may always be brought 
home to one or both of two sources:

1.Individual or collective Gurus,
2.Propaganda.

Let's have a look at a few examples.
===============================================
PEACENICK SCUM OF 1930's.
Entirely generated by Nazi propaganda. It ridiculed 
"demonizing" of Hitler, presented him as a statesman 
open to rational arguments and negotiations via 
Ligue of Nations and played on such strings as fresh 
souvenirs of Verdun, fear of war and "nonsense" of 
dying "for Danzig".
===============================================
HIPPIES or "SPITTING SCUM".
The "ideology" came from Marcuse, one of the most
confused bullshitters of all registered gurus, a Guru 
of all Gurus. His "ideology" mobilized youngsters 
under the hatred of any order, preached scorn of
all of social structures and called for their 
abolishment without a shade of a replacing vision. 
It glorified laziness under the name of spontaneity, 
it glorified laissez aller and obscenity under the name 
of freedom. And it reached the summit of this universal 
hatred and scorn in form of spitting on one's own 
compatriots dead or wounded in Vietnam.
===============================================
FRENCH 1968 "REVOLUTION".
It originated in the University "Faculté de Nanterre".
The French idiotic education system is arranged as 
a pyramid of more and more exclusive "Grandes Ecoles".
On top, the "X" or Polytechnique with probably the 
toughest entrance exam in the world (200 places for 
about 10000 candidates), etc. Fellows who are not 
very good in IQ tests and entrance exams, land fatally 
in Universities like Faculté de Nanterre which accept 
anybody with a High School certificate. There you can 
study Sociology, Social Psychology, Political Economy, 
or Economical Politics, we are a bit confused, but 
anyway some highbrow science which explains how to run 
a country or the world, but does not secure any job. 
So, working as postmen, taxi drivers, or bookkeepers, 
they see all going wrong around, they believe to know 
exactly how it should go, but nobody would listen to 
them and if they talk too loudly, they are dumped in 
some rubbish collector.
They get obsessed by a kind of persecution mania and 
explain their failure by conspiration of Freemasons
or Elders of Zion.
And when the tidal wave raised by the Hippies reached 
France they went to the streets to throw stones, to 
avenge their failure, without any program, without 
having even imported Marcuse. (Only a few minor Gurus 
of the "revolution" such as Cohn Bendit knew that they 
were throwing stones for Marcuse). 
They were joined by suburban scum and by thugs who 
never miss an opportunity to throw stones, to burn cars 
or to sack shops and together paralyzed public services, 
making it impossibe to travel to work, which French
workmen, always welcoming a bit of leisure, greeted as 
unexpected vacations.
Finally, the food supplies went out, more and more
sick needed medical attention and the straw fire died 
out by itself without leaving other traces than burned 
cars, stones on the streets and broken windows.
And, of course, a few highbrow articles written by
minor Nanterre Gurus about the "Revolution which 
Changed the World".
===============================================
BRITISH PEACENICK SCUM AND CAMBRIDGE CLUB.
Cambridge Club followed an apparently different 
pattern than Faculté de Nanterre. Graduating from
this exclusive Uni, Club members were sure to get 
top jobs. But Oxford and Cambridge specialize in 
inculcating into their students mainly conceit 
and arrogance, before any scientific topics. And 
the pedagogical success with respect to Cambridge 
Club surpassed all expectations. They considered 
themselves so great that even the top job in the 
"rotten" British society signified a failure and 
an insult; that the only goal worth considering 
consisted in changing and running the world.
Playing on this conceit and arrogance, a KGB agent 
persuaded them that the only place worthy of their 
eminence was the scientifically structured and 
planned society of Soviet Union. So, the most 
brilliant collective Gurus of history became vulgar 
KGB spies. But they did not tell it the public.  
Spies don't. They just became moral, intellectual, 
ideological, human leaders of the British shade 
of the Cold War Peacenick Scum.
===============================================
PEACENICK SCUM OF THE COLD WAR.
Conceit and arrogance are not limited to élite 
schools.  A celebrated writer or painter may get 
carried by self-admiration to a point where his 
success appears to him as a failure if it does not 
become instrumental in changing and running the 
world, as long as he does not become a Guru. 
The world wide Scum of Peace Fighters flocked under 
Picasso's Dove, followed sociological and scientific 
demagogy of Sartre and Joliot-Curie, danced to the 
music of Yves Montand. Quite an Olympus of Gurus.
We remember the contempt, the repugnance which
we, Gulag slaves, felt with respect to Picasso,
Sartre, Joliot-Curie, Yves Montand and other
Peacenick Gurus visiting us on expense accounts 
exceeding 10 years of our "wages" in order to tell 
us how happy we were, how wonderful our prison was 
and how ready we must be to give our lives in its 
defense.    
===============================================
OUR CURRENT ME HUMANITARIANISM.
Entirely generated by Jihad propaganda. It ridicules 
"demonizing" of Islamism, presents it as a culture
open to rational arguments and negotiations via UN 
and plays on such strings as fear of terrorism and 
"nonsense" of dying "for Danzig", sorry, "for Israel". 
Indeed, it's an exact copy of 1930's Peacenicks with 
Islamism substituted for Nazism.
ME war being fought by Islamist and Jewish 
fundamentalists over the heads of Israeli and 
Palestinian cannon fodder, our peacenicks pretending 
to defend Palestinians, in reality play into the 
hands of Islamists, revigorating the war and 
Palestinian suffering.
===============================================
 

[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]