[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00316: Re: Jihad

From: Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)wanadoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:19:42 +0200
Subject: Re: Jihad

"M. Kolar" wrote:
Dear Georges,
I have still been re-reading and thinking especially about your Jihad page.
How do you for example reconcile your recommendation to use secret services to
solve the world's problems with your claims of organizing workshops seeking
consensus among the Arabs and Jews for 30 years???
===========================================================
G:
As I wrote in another post, Pax Americana is in my site out
of context and cannot be reasonably discussed. I shall prefix it
with "Context" note and suggest that we postpone the discussion
till it's done.
As to reconciliation:
In "ISRAEL-PALESTINE AND THE PIGS" (pigs being Qrwellian metaphore)
I say that IMO the ME war is run by Jewish and Muslim pigs
over the heads of Palestinians and Israelis, using them as
cannon fodder.
Thus,
-War against pigs with secret services and whatever,
-Reconcile Palestinian and Israeli victims of pigs and make
them turn against pigs together.
===========================================================
MK:
P.S. You say:
Let's remember that opposing government decisions
in time of war has a name: "treason".
Every German citizens and then citizens of all the countries occupied
and annexed by Germany (including yourself) who were against Hitler were also
guilty of "treason", right?
==========================================================
Certainly, in Nazis' eyes, and they acted accordingly.
However, we did not accept Nazi law, so in our eyes it
was no treason.
Now, my symbolic "American Friend", to whom I addressed the
Jihad post, accepts American Constitution and law and opposing
it in time of war makes himself clearly guilty of treason.
But again, let's postpone the discussion till Pax Americana
reenters its context.
Georges.
=========================================================



[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]