From: | Bruce Eggum <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com> |
---|---|
Date: | Fri, 29 Apr 2005 06:21:29 -0500 |
Subject: | Re: New applications |
O.K. Next time, I'll subscribe immediately anybody who provides some
suitable information about themselves (like Richard), and ask people like
Giorgio Menon (the last one) for more info - which I have already done.
This seems like a consensus.
(You don't have to send any more comments on this
subject, if you agree.)
Mirek
Ted Becker writes:
> Bruce. That's fine. In a sense it's a subscription, not an application. I go along with that. It is just a more inclusive way of proceeding.
>
> The rest of what is said is fine with me. I also like the disclaimer idea. I mean, we're not Plato's Nocturnal Council.
>
> Ted.
> ==========
>
>>>> bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com 04/26/05 5:17 PM >>>
> Dear Ted,
>
> On 4/26/05, Ted Becker <becketl(at)auburn.edu> wrote:
>> I think it's nice that folks who come in tell us about themselves, but I don't think we need an application process. The proof will come in the contribution they make and the facilitating out of disruptive ones.