[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00101: Re: Mature members

From: Filia den Hollander <fkdh(at)xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:55:05 +0200
Subject: Re: Mature members

Dear Mirek,

I think that by now you have received my email to Eric? It was called "To
Eric (more or less backstage) - Proposal".

Regards,
Filia

op 17-04-2005 23:26 schreef M. Kolar op wddm(at)mkolar.org:

Related to Eric Lim and Stephen Neitzke I wish to make a couple of comments
(Eric is on the WDDM list, Stephen isn�t). I hope it is understood not as
personal attacks but (A) as an explanation of what exactly freaked me out,
and (B) as a comment on respectful conduct in general.
-Eric tried to damage my sovereignty in a play between one-to-one emails a
....

Filia,
frankly, I am personally not sure whether this type of contributions
belongs here, whether other members would be interested? Why to drag in here
personal conflicts?

As for the next item below, I recorded your objections and proposal on two
"Internal Projects" pages.

I have a problem with Antonio Rossin, not with him as a person but with the
way he debates. He throws in a subject and when the subject is tackled he
shifts the subject and always has the last say. On top of this, if someone
rebukes him (not sure if I use this term correct), he somehow gets to you on
a personal level. Especially with this subject shifting, we then run the
risk of never being able to move forward.

With this I�m not saying I�m for or against his participation. I don�t
know
� would it be possible or even desirable to allow participation if someone
accepts certain conditions beforehand?

Mirek


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]