[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00071: Re: Is everybody sure that I am a mature member

From: "M. Kolar" <wddm(at)mkolar.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:31:25 -0600
Subject: Re: Is everybody sure that I am a mature member

Hello everybody!
In the hindsight, it might have been really better to give this group a new
name, (as e.g. Franz Isemann suggested to the G. Sagi). When I hear now that
G. Kokkas still says that he is a spokesman for WDDM. G. Sagi was saying me
the same thing.
I worked on the WDDM renewal under this assumption that we will abandon all
those old unsolved, and apparently unsolvable petty disputes. Thus for me
all the old unofficial hierarchy was wiped out. Nobody registered any real
objections against this approach here except perhaps for George Sagi
recently.
So I think we should recognize the pioneering role the old WDDM had 5 years
ago, but try to avoid their later failures.
Thus we really start from a fresh beginning, and nobody should be afraid to
speak their minds. That's the only way we can achieve something new.
That's at least my position ...
Mirek

Filia den Hollander writes:

Is everybody sure that I am a mature member, i.e. that I can speak my
opinion on this and other applications freely? There's official hierarchy,
where everybody is equal, and can speak their minds. And there's unofficial
hierarchy, which has to do with the history of this forum, and then some
people might feel insulted if a newcomer speaks freely and may disturb the
unofficial composition. Or rather, they would make sure that this will not
happen.
My impression is that this forum is working hard to become a fair forum.
Nevertheless, I want to be absolutely sure that I can speak without, at some
point, be confronted with unofficial hierarchy.


Kind regards,
Filia


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]