Thanks, Mirek, for your response.
There is an error (an extra better) in my suggestion (b). It should read:
b a review of Rule 4, exploring for a better alternatve.
In order not to distract the 'Constituting Convention', let us discuss my proposed review to Rule 4 after it is over. Many still have not confirmed their acceptance or otherwise of the other applicants.
Pursuant to Rule 2, I confirm my acceptance of the 3 additional applicants (Nos. 17 to 19) to the initial membership of the renewed WDDM.
Best Regards
Eric Lim (lpc1998)
"M. Kolar" <wddm(at)mkolar.org> wrote:
lpc1998 wrote:
> b a review of Rule 4, exploring for a better better alternatve.
Please, make a proposal,
Mirek