|DISCUSSION ON HOW TO PROMOTE DIRECT (TRUE) DEMOCRACY|
Any member can post here proposals concerning WDDM (its function, mission, goals, organization).
Actually it is not true that "WDDM only advocates I&BR". WDDM does not officially advocate much if anything yet, because we have not yest managed to arrive at any collective position.
For example, I also advocate government by consensus as the only true democracy, and my position is very similar to that of Parrhesia Joe (see [democracy.mkolar.org], [www.world-wide-democracy.net] - my initial proposal how to renew WDDM where I was also suggesting consensus levels around 80%).
But I am willing to accept I&BR as an important intermediate step better than the current "representative democracy".
Bruce, please do not confuse your personal positions with those of all WDDM which are still very undefined.
So I am repeating again, I believe that the most important thing is to finally set up a procedure on how to arrive at our collective position if we want to have any collective position at all (as oppose to be only a loose discussion club as we have been till now).
|Initiative on WDDM Charter||1056||BrEggum||05/02/2009 12:57PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||791||ParrhesiaJoe||05/08/2009 07:28PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||582||BrEggum||05/14/2009 05:34PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||595||ParrhesiaJoe||05/14/2009 06:32PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||569||WebMaster||05/31/2009 11:13AM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||548||ParrhesiaJoe||06/01/2009 03:43PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||541||MiKolar||05/31/2009 11:34AM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||544||BrEggum||05/31/2009 01:11PM|
|Re: Initiative on WDDM Charter||562||koikaze||05/12/2009 03:41AM|