|DISCUSSION ON HOW TO PROMOTE DIRECT (TRUE) DEMOCRACY|
Any member can post here proposals concerning WDDM (its function, mission, goals, organization).
You seem to have missed the point. I am generally against super majority decisions. It may be requested on specific issues but not by default.
You say a certain level of trust is necessary regarding representatives, that trust is also necessary for the people. If a rep does not show up for a vote, likely I don't want that person voting. Same with people. If the person does not show up to vote, I don't want their vote as it indicates they are to absorbed to cast their decision.
Those of us who do vote, like you and I have likely considered the matter and the majority of us who vote are likely to make good decisions. By maintaining the 50% + 1 we can also change a decision easily. If you make things to tight, people will not be involved.
Keep your site up Roy, times are changing for the better. Slow but sure.
Bruce Eggum Wisconsin USA
|DD Constitutions||1596||RoyDaine||03/11/2008 02:52AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||894||MiKolar||03/28/2008 08:35PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||935||RoyDaine||04/04/2008 07:35AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||849||PVR||04/05/2008 10:47PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||906||RoyDaine||04/07/2008 02:36AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||921||PVR||04/07/2008 08:23PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||824||BrEggum||04/24/2008 11:41AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||966||RoyDaine||04/25/2008 06:02AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||888||BrEggum||04/25/2008 12:08PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||853||RoyDaine||04/25/2008 12:59PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||860||BrEggum||04/25/2008 02:46PM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||852||RoyDaine||06/18/2008 07:53AM|
|Re: DD Constitutions||907||PVR||03/17/2008 10:22PM|