WDDM Worldwide Direct Democracy Movement : BeClayson

WddmWikiMain :: News : Members : Topics : Links : Recent : All : Grouped : Login

Bernard Clayson WDDM Home Page


My site: http://www.planet-thanet.fsnet.co.uk

Options for the WDDM structure

We do not need the 'many rules'.
'Many roads lead to democracy', WDDM can not/should not presume an
'only way', example - I support the principle of I&R, yet I do not
support the I&R that is most used.
WDDM must be open to originality.

How do we get, or get people to be, active rather than indulge in rhetoric
for the sake of 'debate'?

I threw a direct challenge to the political system by doing a public run
referendum and publishing the results in the press and to the Chief Exec,
the leader of the District Council, and to electoral services.
I backed it up by asking international contacts to email the CE and Leader
(with copies to the press) congratulating them on supporting/doing the
referendum.

Catch-22 <grin>

The after effects are still to be realised because the press did not
understand the implications of what I had done, I am in the slow process of
'enlightening' them.
Only the CE and electoral services would understand most of the implications
because I challenged them over the election process when I stood for
council.

Most of the saga is here:
http://www.planet-thanet.fsnet.co.uk/referendum/


Send e-mail to BeClayson


CategoryUsers
 Comments [Hide comments/form]
(Bernard)
How do we get, or get people to be, active rather than indulge in rhetoric
for the sake of 'debate'?
(antonio)
There are two ways.
Either show them how to get something they like
Or show them how to get rid of something they're fearing from.
(Either-and sounds better)
-- AnRossin (2005-04-24 23:51:12)
Bernard and Antonio have good suggestios: George Sagi
-- GeSagi (2005-04-29 19:48:08)